🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.